Home
Weblog Case Histories Books Shop Amazon  Member Survey Advertise
Buyer's Guide News Help Forum Ask Joe! Jobs Videos Newsletters

Search

Lower nav bar

More Links

  Industry Directory
 
Video Center
 
This Week's Newsletter
 
Powder & Bulk Weblog
 
Ask Joe! Archive
 
Trade Shows & Events
 
Industry Associations
 
Journals & Magazines
 
Bulk Density Tables
 
Sieve Chart
 
Tank Size Calculators
 
Add Your Company
 
Add Your Resume
 
Contact Us
.

Sign Up Free!

Click here to read past issues
 "Read by over 6,600 Industry
Professionals each week."

Enter your business email
address & click to sign up
Read Past Issues Here

Featured Book
From
Amazon

Click here for more

Free Shipping
on all orders over $25.

 
Click here now

« October 2005 | Main | December 2005 »


New Powder Show Seminar - "The Business Case for RSS and Blogs for Engineers and Managers in Industrial Companies"

November 24, 2005

Posted by Don Dunnington at 03:30 PM | Comments (0)

Don DunningtonI'll be doing a presentation at the 2006 Powder Show on the “new web” tools, such as RSS and blogs, and how it all fits in with the "old web" (if you can call 10 years "old"). Joining me in the discussion are two pioneers from the "old web," Joe Taylor and Joe Marinelli. We will be sharing our experiences on how to make effective business use of Internet media, new and old.

If you are a visitor to the Powder and Bulk Dot Com website, you’re likely familiar with both Joes.

Joe Taylor is the founder of Powder and Bulk Dot Com and Water and Wastewater Dot Com. He is a graduate of Georgia Institute of Technology with a BEE and a minor in Mining Engineering.

Joe Marinelli is the resident materials handling guru for "Ask Joe!," the monthly help column on Powder and Bulk Dot Com. His firm, Solids Handling Technologies, provides consulting services to process industries. Formerly with Jenike & Johanson, Solids Flow and Peabody TecTank, Marinelli is considered an expert on materials handling and is a long-time leader in hosting an online help forum for processors.

Our conference session is set for Wed., May 10, 2006, from 9 to 10:15am. If you have a question you'd like answered at this session, you can email me or leave a comment here. If you have other questions or comments about the Powder Show, be sure to leave a comment for the Powder Show's Scott Temple here.

Don Dunnington




When the least expensive component fails .......

November 16, 2005

Posted by Joe Lewis at 08:36 AM | Comments (0)

As a senior member of ISA (Instrument Society of America) for the past couple of decades I get InTech magazine monthly.  A recent article in the November 2005 issue (pp 67) entitled "A level experience" indicated that "dumb switches" used for indicating the presence or absence of material at a predetermined point could not be provided with self-diagnostics and had no way of communicating whether they were working.  The article suggested that these point level indicators must be physically tested to ensure that they still work.  Is this really true?  These level indicators tend to be the least expensive, or at the very least a low cost, component within a storage or material handling system.  Can it be expected that they will have a long life (more than one year) and also be self-validating?

What happens when the $200 rotary paddle level indicator (click here) fails?  Or even the $300-400 RF capacitance point level sensor (click here)?  If these units are utilized as high level indicators, an overfill condition could occur if they have failed and you are not aware of it.  There could be damage to other expensive equipment such as filters and conveying systems or just a large clean-up job waiting for you.  If point level indicators are used for detecting a low level condition and they fail without any notice, then you might run out of material and lose production.  Either way, the failure of this low cost component without notification can cost you money and lost profits.

Coincidentally in the same issue of InTech magazine there is another article on pp 45 entitled "Beyond mere measurement".  This article discusses the benefits of field devices (level indicators are considered "field devices") with self-diagnostics and the use of asset management software to improve plant profitability.  In fact the article mentions a reference document/book entitled "An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance" (pp 46 of "Beyond mere measurement") where the author claims that in excess of $200 billion per year is spent on maintenance of plant and equipment in the USA alone.  He claims that this represents lost profits in excess of $60 billion!  Wow, that's a chunk of change!

So, what does that mean to us in the powder and bulk solids processing industries?  My point is simple.  Reliability of the least expensive components is very important.  It is worthwhile to consider a device that DOES incorporate reliable self-diagnostics.  But wait a minute, did the first article mentioned above say that dumb switches couldn't provide this?  Well, for powder and bulk solids point level detection this isn't the case. 

Truly fail-safe rotary paddle devices are commonly available from at least three or four sources.  The most reliable of these is the SafePoint fail-safe rotary paddle unit (click here) that uses patented Hall effect sensor technology to determine its own health status on a continuous basis.  In addition, a dedicated relay output is provided and the contacts can be monitored to inform you of a device failure.  Knowing whether the device is operational or whether it requires maintenance can save you a tremendous amount of time and money. 

Consider using a true fail-safe unit with reliable self-diagnostics.  I call these devices "self-validating" because they not only evaluate their health state but tell you what that state is.


Joe Lewis
Vice President
Monitor Technologies LLC
jlewis@monitortech.com
www.monitortech.com




Selecting The Right Technology ....

November 08, 2005

Posted by Joe Lewis at 04:16 PM | Comments (0)


Problem:  Selecting a continuous level measurement technology for your powder or bulk solid is not always a simple task. In fact many costly mistakes have been made, products taken out of service and costly rework has ensued. So, how do you avoid these mistakes or keep from making them again? I'd like to offer some assistance and the best thing I can think of is to share a white paper I recently published; "Technology Review - Level Measurement of Bulk Solids in Bins, Silos and Hoppers".  Click here to download this white paper.

Solution:  In this white paper we first discuss the challenges associated with continuous level measurement of powders and bulk solids. Next, we identify and review the pros and cons of each technology from a generic standpoint. This is based on our perspective as well as interviews with other manufacturers and users.


One thing for sure, there is no panacea or single solution. Each application is different and should be reviewed independently of the next. Continuous level technologies and brands are not commodities. We conclude with a recommended process of application review and technology selection.

We hope this paper is helpful. You can also review the web seminar on the same subject by
clicking here.

Any questions, let me know.

Joe Lewis
Vice President - Marketing & Sales
Monitor Technologies LLC
Phone: 800-766-6486 or +1-630-365-9403
Email: jlewis@monitortech.com




 
company block
I

Buyers Guide | News | Help Forum | Ask Joe! Column | Jobs | Resumes | Newsletters

Weblog | Case Histories | Books | Shop Amazon | Member Survey | Advertise

.

Copyright © 1998-2008 Camber Southeast, Inc.
Web Site:  http://www.powderandbulk.com
Privacy Statement

I
Home