Home
Weblog Case Histories Books Shop Amazon  Member Survey Advertise
Buyer's Guide News Help Forum Ask Joe! Jobs Videos Newsletters

Search

Lower nav bar

More Links

  Industry Directory
 
Video Center
 
This Week's Newsletter
 
Powder & Bulk Weblog
 
Ask Joe! Archive
 
Trade Shows & Events
 
Industry Associations
 
Journals & Magazines
 
Bulk Density Tables
 
Sieve Chart
 
Tank Size Calculators
 
Add Your Company
 
Add Your Resume
 
Contact Us
.

Sign Up Free!

Click here to read past issues
 "Read by over 6,600 Industry
Professionals each week."

Enter your business email
address & click to sign up
Read Past Issues Here

Featured Book
From
Amazon

Click here for more

Free Shipping
on all orders over $25.

 
Click here now

« Get your video CDs out of your desk drawer and onto the web | Main | 2006 Southern Cross Awards »


Good reading for techies involved with level measurement

March 06, 2007

Posted by Joe Lewis at March 6, 2007 05:40 PM

I was surfing around the other day and ran across the website of Spitzer & Boyes.  They are a consulting firm, they do training and write books and columns.  I spoke with David Spitzer, one of the authors, to see if he would be interested in guest authoring at the level measurement blog, but he gets paid to write and speak.  Any way, the book looks good but I haven't read it. 

The cost of the book is $250 and can be ordered from Amazon or click here.

Non-contact level sensors are a hot topic so this is why I thought you might be interested in this book.  However, contact level sensors (they are working on this book too) should never be ruled out and in fact I feel they are the best choice for most all applications. 

Open-air devices always have to deal with the internal vessel environment.  This especially true for powders.  I have found that the best technology available for continuous level measurement of powders is guided wave radar as this case history illustrates. 

And for granular plastics?  The leading technology is smart cable-based inventory monitors.  This is what ThomasNet can find on that subject.

Got an application you need to discuss?  Post a comment.  It's easy.

Joe Lewis



Comments

We recently used guided wave radar probes from Magnetrol, 7E5 transmitters and 705 probes. These were specified to us and I was eager to see how they would work. These things were a monster to set up. Magnetrol said the Hydrated Lime we were using was not the right application, dielectric constant was too low. They sent a tech out to reprogram the transmitter. Now my problem is, what happens when the client has to replace this item?

As far as Hydrated Lime, Soda Ash, etc, Ultrasonics work fine except when you are loading chemical. I've seen people blow low pressure air to keep the dust off. Good for keeping up with inventory, not for metering product flow.

Jeff

Posted by: Jeff Harmon at March 16, 2007 09:25 AM

Jeff,

Thanks for your comment. I have taken a quick look at the manufacturers' data based on the name and models you provided. I think I see what might have been a potential problem.

The probes for bulks solids as listed in the Magnetrol brochure are the 7X2 and 7X5. Are these what were used? The brochure indicates the minimum dielectric that can be measured using the single cable 7X2 is 4.0 and the minimum dielectric for the 7X5 twin cable is 1.9. These specs are pretty high, especially the one for the single cable which is typically the most common probe used for solids because the twin can have bridging problems.

Hydrated lime usually has pretty good dielectric constant. For example, one manufacturers list the dielectric for hydrated lime at 4.8 and for "lime" or "slaked lime" at 2.0. Unfortunately the dielectric constant of a material can change and can be slightly different depending on the sample and also depending on how packed or loose the sample is that is measured. I think a dielectric of from 2 - 4 is pretty accurate and that should be adequate for guided wave radar technology that is engineered for solids applications.

That being said, when considering the dielectric of the lime and the spec of the product you used, I think that what you were told by Magnetrol is correct, the dielectric constant of the material is too low for their unit. If they sent a tech out and got it working for you, great! Perhaps they adjusted the gain or threshold setting I do not know. I do know that there are other guided wave radar units with rugged single cable probes that off-the-shelf will measure materials with dielectric constants easily down to 2.0 and will measure lime at 2.0 to about 50-60 ft and hydrated lime with a dielectric constant of 4.8 to about 90 ft. There is a relationship between dielectric and measuring range. Look for an article in the April issue of Powder Bulk Solids magazine on how to ensure successful installations of guided wave radar devices as this is covered in that article. There will also be a post coming up on that subject at the Level Measurement blog at www.monitortech.typepad.com so you might want to check that out too.

I hope all this helps somehow. Give me a call if you want to discuss it further or need a solution for this and silimar applications (800-766-6486).

Joe

Posted by: Joe Lewis at March 16, 2007 03:10 PM

Jeff,

I just got some corroborating information on soda ash and the dielectric is about 2.5. Guided wave radar should work fine. Give me a call or email me if needed. Thanks.

Joe

Posted by: Joe Lewis at March 23, 2007 02:02 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

Subscribe to this entry:

(you may use HTML tags for style)

 
company block
I

Buyers Guide | News | Help Forum | Ask Joe! Column | Jobs | Resumes | Newsletters

Weblog | Case Histories | Books | Shop Amazon | Member Survey | Advertise

.

Copyright © 1998-2008 Camber Southeast, Inc.
Web Site:  http://www.powderandbulk.com
Privacy Statement

I
Home